Industrial chemistry and sustainability
How industrial processes are chosen and evaluated: rate, yield, cost, safety and environmental impact, the principles of green chemistry, a case study of the two routes to ethanol, the Haber process revisited, and bioplastics.
On the south coast of NSW, at Bomaderry near Nowra, a large plant takes the starch left over from making flour products and gluten and ferments it into fuel ethanol. Much of the E10 sold in NSW contains ethanol from plants like this. At Kooragang Island in Newcastle and at Kwinana in Western Australia, other plants make ammonia from natural gas and air. Both kinds of plant make useful chemicals, but they face very different questions about cost, energy and carbon.
From the lab to the plant
A reaction that works in a test tube is only the start. Turning it into a process that makes thousands of tonnes a year means balancing competing factors:
| Factor | Questions an engineer asks |
|---|---|
| Rate | Is the product made fast enough? Would a catalyst, higher temperature or higher pressure help? |
| Yield | What limits the yield: equilibrium, side reactions, separation? Can unreacted material be recycled? |
| Cost | Raw materials, energy, equipment, labour, waste treatment. Can by-products be sold? |
| Safety | Are reagents toxic, flammable or explosive? What happens if pressure or temperature runs away? |
| Environment | What waste and greenhouse emissions are produced? How much water and land does it use? |
| Social | Jobs, local health and amenity, competition with food, community acceptance |
The best conditions are usually a compromise. For an exothermic equilibrium, a low temperature gives a better yield but a slower rate; high pressure may help the yield but costs energy and needs stronger, more expensive vessels.
The Haber process, revisited
You met the Haber process in Module 5 (and in Year 10). Here it is as an example of evaluating a process:
$\text{N}_2(g) + 3\text{H}_2(g) \rightleftharpoons 2\text{NH}_3(g) \quad \Delta H = -92 \text{ kJ mol}^{-1}$
- Conditions: about 400–450 °C, 100–250 atm and an iron catalyst. A lower temperature would favour ammonia at equilibrium but be far too slow; high pressure favours the side with fewer gas molecules.
- Yield: only about 15% converts in each pass, but ammonia is condensed out and unreacted gases are recycled, so the overall conversion is about 97%.
- Environmental issue: the hydrogen comes mainly from natural gas by steam reforming, $\text{CH}_4 + 2\text{H}_2\text{O} \rightarrow \text{CO}_2 + 4\text{H}_2$ (overall), so ammonia production emits roughly 1–2% of the world's CO₂. Making the hydrogen by electrolysis of water using renewable electricity ("green ammonia") avoids this, and several Australian projects are being planned around it.
- Social benefit: fertilisers made from ammonia grow the food for about half of the world's population.
Green chemistry
In 1998, Paul Anastas and John Warner set out twelve principles of green chemistry to design processes that reduce harm from the start, rather than cleaning up afterwards. The most useful for HSC are:
- Prevent waste rather than treat it.
- Maximise atom economy: design reactions so that as many reactant atoms as possible end up in the product. $\text{atom economy} = \dfrac{M(\text{desired product})}{\text{total } M(\text{all reactants})} \times 100$.
- Use safer chemicals and solvents, such as water or supercritical CO₂ instead of chlorinated solvents.
- Use less energy: run reactions near room temperature and pressure where possible.
- Use renewable feedstocks such as plant sugars, starch or oils instead of oil and gas.
- Use catalysts rather than reagents that are used up.
- Design products to break down after use rather than persist in the environment.
A simple measure of waste is the E-factor: mass of waste ÷ mass of product. It is below 1 for many bulk chemicals but often 25–100 for pharmaceuticals, because they need many steps, solvents and purifications. Atom economy and percentage yield measure different things: a reaction can have a high yield but a poor atom economy if it produces a lot of by-product.
Case study: two routes to ethanol
Fermentation, $\text{C}_6\text{H}_{12}\text{O}_6(aq) \rightarrow 2\text{C}_2\text{H}_5\text{OH}(aq) + 2\text{CO}_2(g)$, uses a renewable feedstock at low temperature, but it is slow, is done in batches, gives only about 14% ethanol (yeast dies at higher concentrations) and needs energy-intensive distillation. Its atom economy is only 51%, because so much mass leaves as CO₂.
Hydration of ethene, $\text{C}_2\text{H}_4(g) + \text{H}_2\text{O}(g) \rightleftharpoons \text{C}_2\text{H}_5\text{OH}(g)$, has an atom economy of 100%, runs continuously and gives purer ethanol, but uses a fossil feedstock, high temperature and high pressure.
Which is "better" depends on what you value and on outside conditions: the price of oil, a price on carbon, droughts that make grain dear, and whether the feedstock is a waste product (as at Bomaderry) or a food crop. Plants that sell their by-products, such as spent grain solids for stock feed and captured CO₂ for industry, improve both their economics and their environmental case.
- With every weight at 3 ("Today"), fermentation scores 51 and hydration scores 67. Which criteria give hydration its lead?
- Select "Waste feedstock". Fermentation rises to 64, close to hydration's 67. What changed?
- Select "Drought". Fermentation drops to 43. Explain the food-versus-fuel problem this models.
- Set Greenhouse emissions and Renewable feedstock to 5, and Rate, Purity and Atom economy to 1. Fermentation now scores 62 against 51. Which group (a fuel company, a government or an environmental group) might weight the criteria like this?
Bioplastics: designing for the end of life
Polylactic acid (PLA) is a condensation polymer made from lactic acid, which is produced by fermenting sugar or starch. It meets two green-chemistry principles: a renewable feedstock and a product designed to break down. Its ester links can be hydrolysed, so it composts to CO₂ and water. But this only happens quickly in industrial composting at about 58 °C with the right microbes; in a home compost bin, soil or the ocean it can last for years, and it contaminates PET recycling if put in the wrong bin. A sustainable product needs the right collection system as well as the right chemistry.
Test yourself
The atom economy for making ethanol by fermentation of glucose is
2 × 46.07 ÷ 180.16 × 100 = 51.1%; the rest leaves as CO₂.
The Haber process runs at about 450 °C even though a lower temperature gives a higher equilibrium yield of ammonia. The main reason is that
The temperature is a compromise between equilibrium yield and rate.
Which change makes a chemical process better fit the principles of green chemistry?
Safer solvents are a core principle. The others increase waste or energy use.
Why does PLA cutlery not break down quickly in the ocean?
PLA needs about 58 °C and suitable microbes to degrade quickly.
Name each stage in the life cycle of PLA.
Which route to ethanol does each statement describe?
Green chemistry favours feedstocks and reactions with a high . In the Haber process, unreacted nitrogen and hydrogen are . PLA is a polymer that can be broken down by hydrolysis.
Evaluate the production of ethanol by fermentation of sugars compared with the hydration of ethene, considering yield, energy, environmental and social factors.
Chemistry and yield. Fermentation, $\text{C}_6\text{H}_{12}\text{O}_6 \rightarrow 2\text{C}_2\text{H}_5\text{OH} + 2\text{CO}_2$, has an atom economy of 51%, and yeast stops working at about 14% ethanol, so the product must be distilled. Hydration, $\text{C}_2\text{H}_4 + \text{H}_2\text{O} \rightleftharpoons \text{C}_2\text{H}_5\text{OH}$, has an atom economy of 100%; only about 5% converts per pass, but recycling gives about 95% overall, continuously, and a purer product.
Energy. Fermentation runs at 30–35 °C, but distilling a dilute solution uses a lot of energy. Hydration needs 300 °C and 60–70 atm, which also costs energy and strong equipment.
Environment. Fermentation uses renewable plant material, and the CO₂ released was recently absorbed by the plants, though farming and distillation add fossil emissions. Hydration uses ethene from oil or gas, a finite resource that adds fossil carbon to the atmosphere.
Social and economic. Fermentation of food crops needs farmland and water and can raise food prices, especially in drought; using waste starch, as at Bomaderry, avoids this and creates regional jobs. Hydration is cheaper while oil and gas prices are low.
Judgement. Hydration is more efficient chemically, but fermentation of waste feedstocks is more sustainable in the long term. With rising carbon costs and finite fossil fuels, fermentation of non-food feedstocks is the better choice for fuel ethanol, while hydration remains competitive for high-purity industrial ethanol.
Coaching Centre